<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">dgisocio</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Цифровая социология/Digital Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Digital Sociology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658-347X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-1653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Государственный университет управления</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26425/2658-347X-2019-2-25-33</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">dgisocio-17</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЦИФРОВАЯ СРЕДА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Особенности дискурсивной среды как источник создания смысла в онлайн-коммуникации (на примере социальных сетей)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Features of the discursive environment as a source for creating meaning in online communication (using the example of social networks)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-1921</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Юшкина</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yushkina</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Юшкина Надежда Александровна, заместитель директора Центра изучения российской элиты</p><p>г. Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yushkina Nadezhda, Deputy Director of the Center for the Study of the Russian Elite</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">4454508@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-6197</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Панарина</surname><given-names>М. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Panarina</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Панарина Мария Александровна, научный сотрудник</p><p>г. Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Panarina Mariya, Research associate</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">246454@proyonmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБОУ ВО «Государственный университет управления»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State University of Management</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>АНО "Лаборатория Крыштановской"</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>ANO "Laboratory Kryshtanovskaya"</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Юшкина Н.А., Панарина М.А., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Юшкина Н.А., Панарина М.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yushkina N.A., Panarina M.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://digitalsociology.guu.ru/jour/article/view/17">https://digitalsociology.guu.ru/jour/article/view/17</self-uri><abstract><p>С распространением онлайн-коммуникации предпринимается все больше попыток ее исследования как процесса, протекающего в условиях различных дискурсивных пространств. В статье на примере одного сообщения, размещенного в нескольких социальных сетях, проанализированы дискурсивные условия и возможности различных социальных медиа влиять на содержание создаваемых в рамках их среды смыслов. Предметом исследования стали дискурсивные характеристики репрезентаций отдельно взятого сообщения в различных социальных сетях. Цель проведенной работы – демонстрация теоретико-методологического подхода для кроссплатформенного анализа дискурса в социальных медиа, который при желании может быть расширен на большем массиве данных с учетом результатов качественного критического дискурс-анализа представленного кейса. Использован метод критического дискурс-анализа (CDA), который позволяет выявлять и анализировать социальные структуры в рамках диалектических взаимоотношений. В ходе исследования и проведенного анализа было выявлено, что даже в случае, когда использование вариативных возможностей различных социальных сетей по созданию и трансляции смыслов не является осознанной стратегией отдельно взятого института, его сообщения оказались наполнены различным смысловым содержанием, а значит, обладают отличными друг от друга убеждающими и легитимирующими возможностями. Это произошло из-за невозможности избегания определенных условий производства, создания и распространения контента, задаваемых политикой социальных сетей. Социальная сеть как коммуникативное пространство создает режим производства, распространения и потребления контента, и в этом режиме уже осуществляется коммуникация. В силу специфических особенностей каждой сети, можно говорить о том, что они создают разные дискурсивные пространства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>With the spread of online communication, more and more attempts are being made to study it as a process occurring in different discursive spaces. In the article, using the example of a single message hosted on several social networks, the discursive conditions and the possibilities of various social media to influence the content of the meanings, created within their environment, have been analyzed. The subject of the research was the discursive characteristics of representations of a single message in various social networks. The purpose of the paper is presentation of a theoretical and methodological approach for cross-platform analysis of social media discourse, which, if desired, can be expanded on a larger data file, taking into account the results of the qualitative critical discourse analysis of the case introduced. The method of critical discourse analysis (CDA) has been used, which allows you to identify and analyze social structures in the framework of dialectical relationships. In the course of the study and analysis, it was revealed, that even in the case, when using the variable capabilities of various social networks to create and transmit meanings is not a deliberate strategy of a single institution, its messages were filled with different semantic content, which means, that they have different convincing and legitimizing opportunities. This was due to the inability to avoid certain conditions of production, creation and distribution of content, set by the policy of social networks. Social network, as a communicative space, creates a mode of production, distribution and consumption of content, and in this mode, communication is already carried out. Due to the specific features of each network, one can say, that they create different discursive spaces.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>онлайн-коммуникации</kwd><kwd>социальные сети</kwd><kwd>аккаунты органов власти</kwd><kwd>законопроекты</kwd><kwd>дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>производство и потребление контента</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>online communications</kwd><kwd>social networks</kwd><kwd>government accounts</kwd><kwd>bills</kwd><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>content production and consumption</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chouliaraki L. (2006). Towards an analytics of mediation//Critical Discourse Studies. Vol. 3 (2). Pp. 153–178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chouliaraki L. (2006), “Towards an analytics of mediation”, Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 3 (2), pp. 153–178.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dijck J. van and Poell T. (2013). Understanding Social Media Logic//Media and Communication. Vol. 1 (1). Pp. 2–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dijck J. van and Poell T. (2013), “Understanding Social Media Logic”, Media and Communication, vol. 1 (1), pp. 2–14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dijk Т. van (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis//Discourse &amp; Society. Vol. 4 (2). Pp. 249–283.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dijk Т. van (1993), “Principles of critical discourse analysis”, Discourse &amp; Society, vol. 4 (2), pp. 249–283.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fairclough N. (1996). A reply to Henry Widdowson’s discourse analysis: a critical view//Language and Literature. Vol. 5 (1). Pp. 49–56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fairclough N. (1996), “A reply to Henry Widdowson’s discourse analysis: A critical view”, Language and Literature, vol. 5 (1), pp. 49–56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herring S.C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online behaviour//Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 338–376.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herring S.C. (2004), “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior”, Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp. 338–376.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iveson M. (2017). Gendered dimensions of Catalan nationalism and identity construction on Twitter//Discourse &amp; Communication. Vol. 11 (1). Pp. 51–68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iveson M. (2017), “Gendered dimensions of Catalan nationalism and identity construction on Twitter”, Discourse &amp; Communication, vol. 11 (1), pp. 51–68.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Machin D. (2016). The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies//Discourse &amp; Society. Vol. 27 (3). Pp. 322–334.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Machin D. (2016), “The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies”, Discourse &amp; Society, vol. 27 (3), pp. 322–334.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Neverov K. and Budko D. (2017). Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?//Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017. Saint Petersburg, June 21–24, 2017. Saint Petersburg: Association for Computing Machinery. Pp. 189–194.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neverov K. and Budko D. (2017), “Social Networks and Public Policy: Place for Public Dialogue?”, Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Internet and Modern Society, IMS 2017, Saint Petersburg, Russia, June 21–24, 2017, Association for Computing Machinery, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 189–194.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sanina A. (2014). Visual political irony in Russian new media//Discourse, Context &amp; Media. Vol. 6. Pp. 11-21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sanina A. (2014), “Visual political irony in Russian new media”, Discourse, Context &amp; Media, vol. 6, pp. 11–21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spaiser V., Chadefaux T., Donnay K., Russmann F. and Helbing D. (2017). Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests//Journal of Information Technology &amp; Politics. Vol. 14 (2). Pp. 132–153.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spaiser V., Chadefaux T., Donnay K., Russmann F. and Helbing D. (2017), “Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests”, Journal of Information Technology &amp; Politics, vol. 14 (2), pp. 132–153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R. and Vetter E. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE. Pp. 120-124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R. and Vetter E. (2000), Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis, SAGE, London, UK, pp. 120–124.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Toolan M. (1997). What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?//Language and Literature. Vol. 6 (2). Pp. 83–103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toolan M. (1997), “What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?”, Language and Literature, vol. 6 (2), pp. 83–103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
