dgisocioЦифровая социология/Digital SociologyDigital Sociology2658-347X2713-1653Государственный университет управления10.26425/2658-347X-2019-4-11-16dgisocio-21Research ArticleЦИФРОВАЯ СОЦИОЛОГИЯ: НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙDIGITAL SOCIOLOGY: RESEARCH AREASСоциальные сети и биографический методSocial networks and biographical methodhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-6197ПанаринаМ. А.PanarinaM. A.
Научный сотрудник
Москва
Research associate
Moscow
246454@protonmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-2494КуликоваО. А.KulikovaO. A.
Канд. психол. наук, доцент
Москва
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, associate professor
Moscow
kilka2002@yandex.ruАНО «Лаборатория Крыштановской»РоссияANO “Laboratory Kryshtanovskaya”Russian FederationФГБОУ ВО «Государственный университет управления»РоссияState University of ManagementRussian Federation201925022020241116Copyright © Панарина М.А., Куликова О.А., 20202020Панарина М.А., Куликова О.А.Panarina M.A., Kulikova O.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://digitalsociology.guu.ru/jour/article/view/21биографический методсторителлингсторишерингсоциальные сетинарративный фрэймворкканал коммуникациистигматизация женщинкейсbiographical methodstorytellingstory sharingsocial networksnarrative frameworkchannel of communicationstigmatization
of womencase studyReferencesКастельс М. (2017). Власть Коммуникации М.: ВШЭ, С. 592.Кастельс М. (2017). Власть Коммуникации М.: ВШЭ, С. 592.Темкина А.А., Роткирх А. (2002). Советские гендерные контракты и их трансформация в современной России//Социологические исследования. № 11. С. 4–14.Темкина А.А., Роткирх А. (2002). Советские гендерные контракты и их трансформация в современной России//Социологические исследования. № 11. С. 4–14.Byron P., Hunt J. (2017). That happened to me too: young people’s informal knowledge of diverse genders and sexualities//Sex Education. № 17 (3), Pp. 319–332.Byron P., Hunt J. (2017). That happened to me too: young people’s informal knowledge of diverse genders and sexualities//Sex Education. № 17 (3), Pp. 319–332.De Fina A. (2016). Storytelling and audience reactions in social media//Language in Society. № 45(4). Pp. 473–498.De Fina A. (2016). Storytelling and audience reactions in social media//Language in Society. № 45(4). Pp. 473–498.Liao S. (2019). “IAmGay” What about you? Storytelling, discursive politics, and the affective dimension of social media activism against censorship in China//International Journal of Communication. № 13. Pp. 2314–2333.Liao S. (2019). “IAmGay” What about you? Storytelling, discursive politics, and the affective dimension of social media activism against censorship in China//International Journal of Communication. № 13. Pp. 2314–2333.Manney P.J. (2008). Empathy in the time of technology: How storytelling is the key to empathy//Journal of Evolution and Technology, № 19 (1). Pp. 51–61.Manney P.J. (2008). Empathy in the time of technology: How storytelling is the key to empathy//Journal of Evolution and Technology, № 19 (1). Pp. 51–61.McKinsey D. (2014). Strategic storytelling. How to create persuasive business presentations / CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. P. 266.McKinsey D. (2014). Strategic storytelling. How to create persuasive business presentations / CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. P. 266.McLuhan M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. 318 p.McLuhan M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. 318 p.Meretoja H., Davis C. (2017). Storytelling and ethics: Literature, visual arts and the power of narrative. 324 p.Meretoja H., Davis C. (2017). Storytelling and ethics: Literature, visual arts and the power of narrative. 324 p.Page R. (2018). Narratives online. Shared stories in social media//Cambridge University Press. 230 p.Page R. (2018). Narratives online. Shared stories in social media//Cambridge University Press. 230 p.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.