Social risks of educational space digitalization in regional universities: identification and institutionalization problems

   Insufficient conceptualization regarding the analysis of social risks of the educational space digitalization in universities and the ambiguity of their initial prerequisites necessitate the study of this problem. The article analyzes the prerequisites for social risks of the educational space digitalization in regional universities, based on the provisions on their normativity for modern social reality, transformation into a permanent factor of the functioning of complex sociobiotechnical systems, ambivalence of risk, the need for risk genesis process regulation. The well-established statement “risk = uncertainty” is considered, and the author′s own vision of the social risks of the educational space digitalization in regional universities is formulated. It is emphasized that the process of digitalization leads to mass reproduction of uncertainties and, as a consequence, social risks at all levels of social self-organization, including universities, which are open to the external environment. The author describes the specific uncertainties that digitalization creates at the level of the education system and individual universities. The author’s definition of the social risks of the educational space digitalization in a regional university is given as the awareness of its actors of the probability of events that determine the deviation from their goals due to the introduction of digital technologies and encouraging subjects to take actions that do not guarantee the achievement of the planned result. The necessity of risk genesis management as a regulatory influence combining administrative regulation and self-regulation of subjects and counterparties of the educational space of universities in order to identify and use positive opportunities of social risks of digitalization and exclude negative consequences is substantiated. The idea of “risk making” is proposed as an activity to identify and use the constructive potential of social risks of the educational space digitalization and minimize their negative consequences.

1. Beck U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Trans. from Ger., Sage Publications, London, England.

2. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Petrova T. E., Pyrma R. V., Azarov A. A. (2018), “Digital environment of the leading universities of the world and the Russian Federation: results of comparative analysis of site data”, Higher education in Russia, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 9–22, https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-12-9-22

3. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Pyrma R. V., Sinyakov A. V., Azarov A. A. (2019), “The impact of digital communication on Russian youth professional culture: Results of a comprehensive applied study”, Public Opinion Monitoring, no. 1, pp. 228–251, https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.1.11

4. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. B. (1982), Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers, University of California Press, Berkeley, London, England.

5. Giddens A. (1999), “Risk and Responsibility”, Modern Law Review, vol. 62, no 1, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00188

6. Ivanov D. V. (2020), “Augmented modernity: Effects of post-globalization and post-virtualization”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, no. 5, pp. 44–55, https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009397-9

7. Kravchenko S. A. (2016), Sociology of risk and security: Textbook and Workbook for Academic Bachelor’s Degree, Yurait, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

8. Ljovkin V. E., Ljovkina A. O., Docenko E. L., Volosnikova L. M. (2020), “The idea of education: development or service delivery?”, Obrazovanie i nauka, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 9–42, https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-4-9-42

9. Logvinova A. V. (2019), “The problem of classification of social risks of administrative management of a regional higher education institution”, Nomothetika: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 329–337, https://doi.org/10.18413/2075-4566-2019-44-2-329-337

10. Luhmann N. (1993), Risk: A Sociological Theory, de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.

11. Schwab K. (2018), Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution, trans. from Eng., Eksmo, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

12. Tuzikov A. R. (2020), “Russian higher education: ideologems of reforms and imitation practice”, Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem, no. 1, pp. 60–65.

13. Weber M. (1997), Selected works, Trans. from Ger., Progress, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

14. Yanitsky O. N. (2016), “Sociobiotechnical systems: a new approach to humanity-nature interaction”, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 5–22, https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2016.4.3.4574

15. Yanitsky O. N. (2003), “Sociology of risk: key ideas”, Universe of Russia, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–35.

16. Zotov V. V. (2020), “Subject matter of reflexion and research methodology of digital society”, Institutes and mechanisms of innovative development: World Experience and Russian Practice: Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kursk, 10 December 2020, in 2 v., vol. 1, Universitetskaya kniga, Kursk, Russia, pp. 222–225.

17. Zubkov V. I. (2003), Sociological theory of risk: monograph, RUDN University Publishing house, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).

18. Zubok Yu. A, Chuprov V. I. (2008), “Social regulation in conditions of uncertainty. Theoretical and applied problems in the study of youth”, Public Opinion Monitoring, no. 2, pp. 142–255.

19. Zubok Yu. A., Chuprov V. I. (2017), “Modern sociology of youth: Changing reality and theoretical approaches”, Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya, no. 15, pp. 12–48.

20. Zubok Yu. A., Chuprov V. I. [eds.] (2008), Sociology of youth: Encyclopaedic Dictionary, Academia, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).