Electronic petitions in France on the material of Change.org, a non-governmental e-petition platform
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2022-5-3-45-56
Abstract
The article presents the results of an empirical study on electronic petitions posted on the Change.org French-speaking segment, geographically linked to France. The relevance of the topic is due to the intervention of modern information and communication technologies in political reality and the need for scientific reflection of the consequences of digital changes in political processes. The authors of the article analyse the regional particularities of the online petition activity by the inhabitants of France on the material of 15 887 electronic petitions (January 2015 – October 2017), 570 of which are petitions with the status of “victory” (4 %). The authors note that the European territories of France form three main groups of online petition activity (with low, medium and high petition activity). Residents of France most often relate to social problems (social security, health care and education) in electronic petitions. In addition, Change.org is actively registering electronic petitions on issues related to crime and terrorism, discrimination, the environment, the economy and animal welfare. Electronic petitions about problems of culture, sports and problems of confessional relations are recorded relatively rarely. The greatest response from the recipients of the petition is caused by problems in the social sphere, education and health. The French society, through the prism of activity on the non-governmental Internet resource Change.org, appears as a modern society with post-industrial values, preoccupied with security issues, in an active and relatively productive dialogue with its political and business elite.
Keywords
Electronic petitions,
electronic democracy,
online petition activity,
France,
Change.org,
online resources,
digital communication,
digital political mobilisation
Supporting agencies: The article was supported by RFBR, research project No. 18-011-00140-A “Electronic Petition as a Frame for Social and Political Mobilization (Russian and Cross-Cultural Perspectives)”.
About the Authors
K. V. Bannikov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin V. Bannikov, Senior Lecturer, Department of Literature and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Humanities
Moscow
N. K. Radina
Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University - National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda K. Radina, Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Prof.
Nizhny Novgorod
O. A. Smirnova
Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University –National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Smirnova, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Prof. Assoc., Foreign Languages and Linguistics Department, Head of French Centre, Institute of International Relations and World History
Nizhny Novgorod
D. V. Shavarova
IE Shavarova D.V.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria V. Shavarova, Master Degree, Individual Entrepreneur (Manager)
Nizhniy Novgorod
References
1. Andreev A. V. & Meshcheryagina V. A. (2015), “Collective appeal as a constitutional element of the mechanism of interaction between civil society and the state”, Yuridicheskiy vestnik DGU, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 22–26.
2. Aragón P., Sáez-Trumper D., Redi M., Hale S.A., Gómez V. & Kaltenbrunner A. (2019), “Online petitioning through data exploration and what we found there: a dataset of petitions from Avaaz.org”, International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018), available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.08282.pdf (accessed 20.06.2022).
3. Asher M., Leston C. & Spaiser B. V. (2017), “Assessing the effectiveness of e-petitioning through Twitter conversations”, PSA annual conference, Glasgow, April 2017, available at: https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/conference/papers/2017/Twitter_discussions_on_e-petitions_MA_CLB_VS_PSA_April2007.pdf (accessed 20.06.2022).
4. Bannikov K. V., Belyashova D. S., Kozlova A. V., Krasnova K. V., Krupnaya D. A., Lyachina K. G., Porshnev A. V., Radina N. K., Shavarova D. V. & Yagubova K. D. (2019), In: Radina N. K. Digital political participation: the effectiveness of electronic petitions on the Change.org and ROI Internet platforms: Russian and cross-cultural perspectives: coll. monograph, Nestor-Istoriya, Saint Petersburg, Russia (in Russian).
5. Barats C., Dister A., Gambette P., Leblanc J.-M. & Peres-Leblanc M. (2019), “Ce que les données textuelles disent du pétitionnement en ligne: entre contraintes et appropriations du dispositif”, Questions de communication, no. 36, https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.21042
6. Barats C., Dister A., Gambette Ph., Leblanc J.-M. & Peres M. (2016), “Analyser des pétitions en ligne: potentialités et limites d’un dispositif d’études pluridisciplinaires”, Journées d’analyse des données textuelles (Université de Nice, du 07/06/2016 au 10/06/2016), available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.3/237925 (accessed 20.06.2022).
7. Berg J. (2015), “The dark side of e-petitions? Exploring anonymous signatures”, First Monday, vol. 22, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i2.6001
8. Boure R. & Bousquet F. (2010), “Enjeux, jeux et usages d’une pétition politique en ligne: “La pétition Vauzelle”” = ”Implications and uses of a political petition online “The Vauzelle Petition””, Réseaux, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 127–159, https://doi.org/10.3917/res.164.0127
9. Boure R., Bousquet F. & Marchand P. (2012), “Mediators and signers of online petitions. The example of three petitions on national identity”, Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication, vol. 13/1, no. 1, pp. 99–119.
10. Boyadjian J., Olivesi A. & Velcin J. (2017), “Le web politique au prisme de la science des données: Des croisements disciplinaires aux renouvellements épistémologiques” = ”Studying the political web through data science from overlaps between disciplines to epistemological renewals”, Réseaux, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. 9–31, https://doi.org/10.3917/res.204.0009
11. Chugunov A. V. (2014), “E-democracy and e-participation in Russia: preliminary results of Russian e-petition portal monitoring”, Proceedings of the Third International Scientific and Practical Conference “Social computing: fundamentals, development technologies, social-humanitarian effects (ISC- 14)”, Moscow, 18–19 September 2014, M. A. Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, pp. 295–298 (in Russian).
12. Davydova M. L. & Goncharova A. A. (2015), “Problems and prospects of the Russian Public Initiative project”, Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. universiteta. Seriya 5. Yurisprudentsiya, no. 2 (27), pp. 58–67.
13. Diaz C., Kosta E., Dekeyser H., Kohlweiss M. & Nigusse G. (2008), “Privacy preserving electronic petitions”, Identity in the Information Society, no. 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-009-0012-8
14. Elnoshokaty A. S., Deng S. & Kwak D. H. (2016), “Success factors of online petitions: Evidence from change.org”, 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1979–1985, https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.249
15. Golbraikh V. B. (2016), “Environmental public initiative in the internet as a new public participation practice”, Tomsk State University journal of philosophy, sociology and political science, no. 4 (36), pp. 340–450, https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/36/34
16. Hagen L. et al. (2016), “E-petition popularity: Do linguistic and semantic factors matter?”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 783–795, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.006
17. Halpin D., Vromen A., Vaughan M. & Raissi M. (2018), “Online petitioning and politics: the development of Change.org in Australia”, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 428–445, https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2018.1499010
18. Jho W. & Song K. J. (2015), “Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet?”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 488–495, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.003
19. Kneuer M. (2016), “E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy”, International Political Science Review, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 666–678, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116657677
20. Leston-Bandeira C. (2019), “Parliamentary petitions and public engagement: an empirical analysis of the role of e-petitions”, Policy & Politics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 415–436, https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420117
21. Lips S., Ahmed R. K., Zulfigarzada K., Krimmer R. & Draheim D. (2021), “Digital sovereignty and participation in an autocratic state: designing an e-petition system for developing countries”, In: DG.O2021. The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 123–131, https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463706
22. Luchenko D. (2019), “The electronic petition as a way to influence the power available to every citizen: The role and prospects in Ukraine”, Int. Conf. Society. Health. Welfare. 2018. SHS Web of Conferences, no. 68, article 01019, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196801019
23. Lyskova E. I. (2009), “The right of citizens to apply to public authorities: theory and practice”, State and law, no. 9, pp. 105–111.
24. Mccullagh K. (2003), “E-democracy: potential for Political Revolution?”, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 149–151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/11.2.149
25. Mironov M. A. (2014), “Russia Needs a Law on Petitions”, Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye parvo, no. 6, pp. 15–19.
26. Palmieri S. A. (2008), “Petition Effectiveness: Improving Citizens’ Direct Access to Parliament”, Australasian Parliamentary Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 121–135.
27. Radina N. K. & Krupnaya D. A. (2019), “Digital policy participation: efficiency of e-petitions of non-state digital platforms (based on the material of Change.org)”, Polis. Political Studies, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 113–127, https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.09
28. Radina N. K. (2020), “On the biopolitics of power and society: petitions for animal protection in Russia, Germany and France (based on Change.org petitions)”, Moscow State University bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and political science, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 70–93, https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-2-70-93
29. Radina N. K. & Belyashova D. S. (2021), “Digital political participation of Western and Eastern parts of Germany residents (based on Change.org online petitions)”, Changing Societies & Personalities, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–82, https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2021.5.1.122
30. Ranchordás S. (2017), “Digital agoras: democratic legitimacy, online participation and the case of Uber-petitions”, Theory and Practice of Legislation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–54, https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2017.1279431
31. Rastorguev S. V. & Tyan Yu. S. (2021), “Protest eco-activism in the digital environment (on the example of the “Krasnoyarsk case”)”, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 6 (166), pp. 53–75, https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2017
32. Riehm R., Böhle K. & Lindner R. (2014), Electronic petitioning and modernization of petitioning systems in Europe, TAB, Berlin.
33. Subramanian S., Baldwin T. & Cohn T. (2018), “Content-based popularity prediction of online petitions using a deep regression model”, In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 182–188, Melbourne, Australia, Association for Computational Linguistics, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-2030
34. Suh J. H., Park Ch. H. & Jeon S. H. (2010), “Applying text and data mining techniques to forecasting the trend of petitions filed to e-People”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 7255–7268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.002
35. Vidgen B. & Yasseri T. (2019), “What, when and where of petitions submitted to the UK government during a time of chaos”, Policy Sciences, vol. 53, pp. 535–557, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09395-y
Review
For citations:
Bannikov K.V., Radina N.K., Smirnova O.A., Shavarova D.V. Electronic petitions in France on the material of Change.org, a non-governmental e-petition platform. Digital Sociology. 2022;5(3):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2022-5-3-45-56
Views:
408
Email this article 
