Digital participation: category conceptualization in foreign practice of civic engagement

The participatory model of civic participation is attracting more and more attention from researchers of modern societies. The article is devoted to the issue of determining the content and structural components of digital participation concept. The problem of the digital technologies’ effectiveness for the implementation of civic activity is considered in the context of the practice and experience of foreign organizations in the implementation of digital activism. The author conducts an informal analysis of 46 foreign websites, their content is related to the development of digital participation (government agencies, educational and charitable organizations, digital platforms). The study made it possible to build a structural model of digital participation, including the main subjects, their goals and the necessary conditions / factors of the non-digital and digital environment, as well as the personal component. This is connected with an expanded context in the interpretation of digital participation, which considers the activities of not only the subjects of civic participation itself, but also all other subjects and conditions necessary for the involvement of citizens in digital participation. It is shown that the practice-oriented understanding of digital participation is based on a number of provisions in the documents of international organizations (the United Nations, the European Union) and is based on the assessment through various international indices. The participatory interpretation allows us to conclude that civic participation is extremely positive, based on a culture of participation and consistency in the goals of various social groups and subjects.

1. Basheva O. A. (2020), “Digital activism as a new method of civil mobilization”, Research Result. Sociology and management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–57, https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-4

2. Biegelbauer P., Hansen J. (2011), “Democratic Theory and Citizen Participation: Democracy Models in the Evaluation of Public Participation in Science and Technology”, Science and Public Policy. vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 589–597, https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13092649606404

3. Chernov I.V. (2021), “Digitalization as a Tendency of Development of Modern Society: Specificity of the Scientific Discourse”, Humanities of the South of Russia, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121–132, https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2021.1.11

4. Denikin A.A. (2018), “Concerning the definition of a term “participation” in the context of contemporary artistic practices”, The Art and Science of Television, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 58–79, https://doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2018-14.1-58-79

5. Dombrovskaya A.Y. (2020), “Civil Activism of Youth in Modern Russia: Features of its Manifestation in Online and Offline Environments”, Vlast’(The Authority), vol. 28, № 2, pp. 51–58, https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7134

6. Grishaeva S.A., Shamaev P.A. (2022), “Young people’s political participation in the digital environment”, Digital sociology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25-35, https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2022-5-1-25-35

7. Khosrow-Pour M. (2021), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 5th edition, IGI Global, Hershey, US, https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-7998-3479-3

8. Popov A.V. (2022), “Features of digital civic engagement in Russia and abroad”, Social entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–101, https://doi.org/10.18334/social.3.1.114242

9. Saburova L.А., Blagodatsky G.A., Stazhilov V.V., Vantrusov P.V. (2021), “Factors of social mobilization in internet communities”, PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin, no. 3, pp. 156–170, https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2021.3.11

10. Seifert A., Rössel J. (2019), “Digital Participation”, In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_1017-1

11. Shkitina N.S., Kasatkina N.S. (2019), “Participative teacher training in pedagogical universities”, Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, no. 4, pp. 50–57, https://doi.org/10.36906/2311-4444/19-4/08

12. Sivovolov D.L. (2007), “Internet site as a subject of sociological research: a method for analyzing interactive documents”, Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, no. 16, pp. 139–143.

13. Vagin V.V., Petrova I.V. (2020), “The Role of Public Participation in Ensuring the Efficiency of Budget Expenditures”, Financial Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 25–38, https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-6-25-38

14. Vasilenko L., Meshchryakova N. (2021), Sociology of Digital Society: monograph, TPU Publishing House, Tomsk, Russia (In Russian).

15. Zotov V.V., Boev Е.I., Vasilenko L.A. (2021), “Civic activity in the region’s socio-network space”, Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 203–216. Available at: https://swsu.ru/izvestiya/serieseconom/archiv/2_2021.pdf (accessed 31.08.2022).