STEM salaries in Russia: the importance of human capital and institutional factors

In the age of digital transformation, there is an increasing discussion about human resource shortages. In particular, IT professionals, and specialists in science and technology (STEM – Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) in general. One of the decisive factors in attracting and retaining a highly skilled workforce is the level of compensation, so it is important to understand what determinants affect its level in Russia, which is the focus of this study. The influence of human capital (special experience and availability of higher education) and institutional factors (organization size, economic sector, organization profile) were considered. The data of the National Research University Higher School of Economics Russian Monitoring of Economic Situation and Health for 2010–2020 were used for the analysis. The paper presents a detailed description of the final sample (N = 4 674). The J. Mintzer wage equation is used as the main econometric model. The results show that the level of financial compensation increases when a STEM specialist has higher education, works in a large and commercial organization. Work experience has no effect on compensation. The profile of the organization (technical or not) also did not show an unambiguous result in this study.

1. Acemoglu D., Autor D. (2011), “Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings”, In: D. Card, O. Ashenfelter (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4, part B, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1043–1171, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5

2. Anderson M., Banker R., Ravindran S. (2000), “Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, vol. 46, no. 4. Pp. 530–547, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.530.12055

3. Ang S., Slaughter S., Ng K.Y. (2002), “Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions”, Management Science, vol. 48, no. 11, article number 1427, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1427.264

4. Deming D., Noray K. (2019), “STEM Careers and the Changing Skill Requirements of Work”, HKS Working Paper, no RWP19-025, August, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3451346

5. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R., Oshchepkov А. (2016), “Return to Tenure Revisited”, HSE Economic Journal, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 553–587.

6. Gimpelson V.E., Zinchenko D.I. (2021), “‘Physicists’ and ‘lyricists’: Whom the Russian labor market values higher?”, Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. (8), pp. 5–36, https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-5-36

7. Handy F., Katz E. (1998), “The wage differential between nonprofit institutions and corporations: Getting more by paying less”, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 246–261, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1998.1520

8. Katz L.F., Murphy K.M. (1992), “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963– 1987: Supply and Demand Factors” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 35–78, https://doi.org/10.2307/2118323

9. Kelchevskaya N.R., Shirinkina E.V. (2019), “Regional Determinants of Effective Use of Human Capital in the Digital Economy”, Economy of region = Ekonomika regiona, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 465–482, https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-2-12

10. Levina N., Xin M. (2007), “Research Note – Comparing IT Workers’ Compensation Across Country Contexts: Demographic, Human Capital, and Institutional Factors”, Information Systems Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 193–210, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0121

11. Mikhaylova E.A. (2016), “Implementation of professional capacity of Russian women: sociological dimension”, Woman in Russian Society, no. 3, pp. 25–38, https://doi.org/10.21064/winrs.2016.3.3

12. Mincer J. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.

13. Segal M. (1986), “Post-institutionalism in labor economics: The forties and fifties revisited”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, no. 39, pp. 388–403, https://doi.org/10.2307/2524098

14. Talmor E., Wallace J.S. (1998), “Computer industry executives: An analysis of the new barons’ compensation”, Information Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 398–414, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.4.398

15. Xuan Jiang (2021), “Women in STEM: Ability, preference, and value”, Labour Economics, vol. 70, article number 101991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101991

16. Xue Yi, Larson R.C. (2015), “STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes”, Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2015.14

17. Zadvornova Yu.S. (2019), “Elimination of gender wage gap in STEM as a key task of eradication of gender inequality in countries with digital economy”, Woman in Russian Society, no. 3, pp. 114–120, https://doi.org/10.21064/winrs.2019.3.9