Comparative analysis of the Russian regions using machine learning methods for a set of indicators of electronic services
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2024-7-4-33-43
Abstract
Digitalisation is important not only for the work of professionals in their workplaces, but also for the well-being of specialists and adaptation to changes in the information sphere as well as for providing high-quality educational, medical and social services to the population. The paper uses machine learning methods to classify regions according to a set of indicators of electronic services and services. A clear division of the regions into two large, almost equal groups according to this set of indicators has been obtained. The use of well-known statistical criteria has demonstrated the statistical significance of such a division. Scattering diagrams are constructed as an example of the relationship of such indicators. The multiple correlation coefficient between the indicators of electronic services and services is 0.71, which indicates a close relationship between the indicators of digitalisation of services. In addition, the division of regions into clusters has been obtained using hierarchical clustering, which implies that Moscow has significantly overtaken other regions of Russia in providing electronic services and services, and the remaining regions are heterogeneous in this indicator, considering the considered indicators of digitalisation of the subjects according to the Federal State Statistics Service data for May 2024.
About the Author
L. A. BorisovaRussian Federation
Ludmila R. Borisova - Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Assoc. Prof. at the Mathematics and Data Analysis Department
References
1. Ashmanov I.S., Kaspersky N.I. Digital hygiene. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2021. 400 p. (In Russian).
2. Babintsev V.P., Serkina Ya.I. “Digital transformation” and “digitalization” of social reality in the subject field of sociology: the problem of the adequacy of concepts Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. 2022;4:80–91. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2022.4.7
3. Balchindorzhieva O.V., Zolkhoeva M.V. Digital culture vs cultural uniqueness? (on the issue of preserving Chinese cultural identity). Sociological Studies. 2022;3:90–97. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250016858-6
4. Borisova L.R., Kuznetsova A.A. Analysis of multiparametric datasets using machine learning methods to create recommendation systems in HP practice. In: Digital transformation of social and economic systems: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, January 2024. Moscow: Moscow Witte University; 2024. Pp. 195–203. (In Russian).
5. Borisova L.R., Kuznetsova A.V., Sergeeva N.V., Senko O.V. Application of machine learning methods for comparing companies in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation according to economic criteria in accordance with the rating of the polar index. Computer Research and Modeling. 2020;1(12):201–215. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2020-12-1-201-215
6. Divina T., Petrakova E. Cherskov A. Applying the hierarchy analysis method to evaluate learning outcomes. In: Proceedings Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Digital Education (ASEDU-II), Krasnoyarsk, 28 October 2021. New York: AIP Publishing; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104789
7. Groshev I.V., Krasovsky Yu.D. Digital transformation of social research and development. Digital Sociology. 2018;1:9–17. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.26425/2658-347Х-2018-1-9-17
8. Isaenko V.O., Rybina M.N. The introduction of the CardioQVARK system for the personalization of treatment in the context of the formation of a digital healthcare ecosystem. Digital Sociology. 2018;1:35–40. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2018-1-35-40
9. Khlystova O., Kaluzhnоva Y. The impact of the creative industries and digitalization on regional resilience and productive entrepreneurship. The Jour nal of Technology Transfer. 2023;48:1654–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10020-2
10. Konyukhova V.E., Vafoev D.A. The role of mathematical modeling in the digital economy. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues of Digital Technologies. 2023;1(3):121–126. (In Russian).
11. Kropivetsky E.N., Duboglazova Yu.A., Zaborovsky D.A. Digitalization of services in the social sphere: problems and prospects. Economic Sciences. 2022;4(209):258–264. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14451/1.209.258
12. Kryshtanovskaya O.V. Contactless sociology: new forms of research in the digital age. Digital Sociology. 2018;1(1):4–8. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2018-1-4-8
13. Kuznetsova A.V., Senko O.V. Possibilities of using Data Mining methods in medical laboratory research to identify patterns in data arrays. Doctor and information technologies. 2005;1:49–56. (In Russian).
14. Kuznetsova A.V., Senko O.V., Kuznetsova Yu.O. Overcoming the black box problem when using machine-learning methods in medicine. Doctor and information technologies. 2018;7:74–80. (In Russian).
15. Kuznetsova Yu.O., Borisova L.R., Kuznetsova A.V., Senko O.V. Transparent interface for forecasting in machine learning. In: Data analytics and management in data-intensive areas: Proceedings of the XIX International Conference DAMDID/RCDL’ 2017, Moscow, October 10–13, 2017. Moscow: Federal Research Centre “Informatics and Management” of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. Pp. 493–495. (In Russian).
16. Mamchenko O.P., Akimochkina T.A., Polovnikova E.S., Shapovalova S.V. Modeling of socio-economic processes in the context of digitalization of the economy. Management of economic systems. 2019;5(123). (In Russian).
17. Matviyevsky S.S., Borisova L.R. Clustering of the countries of the Asia-Pacific region according to the values of inclusive economic growth. Vestnik universiteta. 2023;1:112–121. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-1-112-121
18. Petrova N.P., Ovechkina A.I. On the issue of the digital transformation of the Russian economy. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2021;1:57–62. (In Russian).
19. Romanova N.V. Digitalization of social services: problems and prospects. Bulletin of the USPTU. Science, education, economics. Economics series. 2020;1(31):58–65. (In Russian).
20. Saati T. Decision-making. Method of hierarchy analysis. Trans. from Eng. R.G. Vachnadze. Moscow: Radio i svyaz; 1993. 278 p. (In Russian).
21. Senko O., Kuznetsova A. A recognition method based on collective decision making using systems of regularities of various types. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 2010;2(20):152-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1054661810020069
22. Senko O.V., Kuznetsova A.V., Voronin E.M., Kravtsova O.D., Dobrolyubova O.A., Borisova L.R. et al.Methods of data mining in studies of the COVID-19 epidemic. Journal of the Belarussian State University. Mathematics. Computer Science. 2022;1:83–96. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33581/2520-6508-2022-1-83-96
23. Shchekotin E.V., Goiko V.L., Basina P.A., Bakulin V.V. Using machine learning to study the quality of life of the population: methodological aspects. Digital Sociology. 2022;1(5):87–97. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2022-5-1-87-97
24. Sukhov A.N. Digitalization of the social sphere and its consequences. Social Policy and Social Partnership. 2023;8. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33920/pol-01-2308-01
25. Toth G., Elekes Z., Whittle A., Lee Ch. Technology network structure conditions the economic resilience of regions. Economic Geography. 2022;4(98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2035715
26. Vakulenko S.A., Zhikhareva A.A. Practical course on neural networks: textbook. St. Petersburg: University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics; 2018. 71 p. (In Russian).
27. Zhang J, Gorp D. van, Kievit H. Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: an ecosystem perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2022;48(3):1077–1105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09934-0
Review
For citations:
Borisova L.A. Comparative analysis of the Russian regions using machine learning methods for a set of indicators of electronic services. Digital Sociology. 2024;7(4):33-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2024-7-4-33-43