Welfare state in the digital age: digital opportunities or digital inequality
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2025-8-2-27-44
Abstract
This article explores the transformation of social policy in the context of digitalisation at the level of the Russian Federation’s regions. The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of digital technologies on the implementation of welfare state principles and reduction of social inequality in various regional contexts. Empirical cases include Saint Petersburg, Tyumen Oblast, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, and Zabaykalsky Krai – the regions representing contrasting levels of digital maturity, budgetary capacity, and institutional development. The methodology is based on qualitative content analysis of strategic documents and public speeches, comparison of digital indicators (internet penetration, use of the “Gosuslugi” platform, digital literacy), and secondary analysis of statistical and regulatory sources for 2021–2024. The results enabled the identification of four regional models of digital social policy, differing in terms of technological integration and social inclusiveness. A stable correlation is established between institutional capacity and depth of digital transformation. The study highlights the importance of cultural adaptation of digital services and infrastructure development in remote and ethnically diverse areas. The findings confirm that digitalisation can either reduce or exacerbate social stratification, depending on management strategies and resource availability. These results can be applied in sociological and public policy studies of the digital state, in the design of inclusive digital services, and in the development of regional social support programmes.
About the Author
T. R. AramisovRussian Federation
Timur R. Aramisov, Director of the Centrе for Socio-Political Studies, Senior Lecturer at the Theory and Technology of Social Work Department
Nalchik
References
1. Abramov V.I., Andreev V.D. Analysis of strategies for digital transformation of Russian regions in the context of achieving national goals. Public Administration Issues. 2023;1:89–119. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-1-89-119
2. Abramov V.I., Andreev V.D. First year of implementation of digital transformation programs in the regions of Russia: problems and results. Public Administration Issues. 2024;2:110–128. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2024-0-2-110-128
3. Atlaskirov A.R. Digital transformation in traditional society (on the example of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic). 2023;1(11):138–156. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2023.11.1.8
4. Couldry N., Mejias U.A. The costs of connection. How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2019. 352 p.
5. Dijk J.A.G.M. The deepening divide. Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing; 2005. 240 р.
6. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. New York: Princeton University Press; 1990. 248 p.
7. Eubanks V. Automating inequality. How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2018. 272 p.
8. Graham M., Dittus M. Geographies of digital exclusion. Data and inequality. London: Pluto Press; 2022. 210 p.
9. Hindman M. The internet trap. How the digital economy builds monopolies and undermines democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2018. 256 p.
10. Hintz A., Dencik L., Wahl-Jorgensen K., Arslan S.C. Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Publizistik. 2019;64:391–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00508-z
11. Kabanov Yu.A., Sanina A.G., Styrin E.M. Digital transformation of governmentand socio-economic inequalityin a cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2024;2(22):195–208. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-2-195-208
12. Kazanbieva A.Kh. Assessment of the level of digitalization of Russian region. Innovation & Investment. 2023;4:369–375.
13. Kolosova G.V. Innovative management of the social sphere in the context of digitalization. Sociology and Law. 2023;1(15):79–87. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2023-1-79-87
14. Korovkin V.V. The digital life of Russian regions 2020. What defines the digital divide? Moscow: Institute for Emerging Markets Research of “Skolkovo”; 2020. 62 p. (In Russian).
15. Marshall Th.H. Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1950.
16. Orekhov A.M., Chubarov N.A. Digital inequality and digital justice: social-philosophical aspects of the problem. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2024;1(28):260–272. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-1-260-272
17. Platonova S.I. Digital inequality as a new form of social inequality. Intellect. Innovations. Investments. 2024;6:139–149. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-6-139
18. Shogenov M.Z., Guppoev T.B. Independent assessment of quality of the state social services in conditions of digitalization of public administration. In: Breakthrough development of Russia’s economy: conditions, tools, effects: Рroceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, part 1, Nalchik, October 11–13, 2018. Nalchik: Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H.M. Berbekov; 2018. Pp. 280–288. (In Russian).
19. Zueva N.L. Digitalization of the social sphere. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2022;2(49):277–287. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17308/law/1995-5502/2022/2/277-287
Review
For citations:
Aramisov T.R. Welfare state in the digital age: digital opportunities or digital inequality. Digital Sociology. 2025;8(2):27-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2025-8-2-27-44