Digitalization of public administration in Russia: risks, casuses, problems

The article is devoted to the deliberation of the processes of digitalization of the activities of the authorities in modern conditions. The purpose of this article is to open a discussion on the problems of introducing new information and telecommunication technologies and improving the efficiency of the public administration system. Based on the analysis of the experience of implementing digital technologies and platform solutions in the field of public administration, a substantial characteristic of the problems of digitalization of public administration has been given. The key issues that require attention when carrying out digitalization of public administration on the basis of SWOT-analysis in terms of identifying weak, problematic aspects of the activities of the authorities and threats arising from the modern state of the Russian society, have been defined. Highlighting the weaknesses of modern public administration, the authors drew attention to such aspects of this problem as: 1) realization of “digitalization for the purpose of digitalization”; 2) deficiency of the required legal regulatory framework; 3) inefficiency of electronic document workflow, including problems caused by imperfections of the interface of reporting interactive forms, frequent change of the composition of indicators in reporting forms, desire of higher authorities to solve the problem of input of volume primary data at the expense of lower hierarchical levels; 4) absence of data analysis infrastructure, including due to imperfections of organization of interaction between agencies and incompatibility of information resources; 5) lack of data analysts and deficiency of necessary digital competences among state and municipal employees. Considering the threats and risks to the public administration system, the authors highlighted such aspects generated by the state of Russian society as: 1) creating a system of digital bureaucracy, 2) maintaining information and digital inequality, 3) insufficient knowledge and skills of citizens in the field of digital technologies, 4) reducing the publicity of the system of state and municipal administration. In the conclusion of the article it has been emphasized that the given facts are not unambiguously negatively interpreted, but it would be inexcusable to ignore even a small amount of them. It has been proposed to conduct a large-scale study that combines self-analysis of the processes of digitalization by authorities, a sociological study based on expert and mass surveys, an Internet survey.

1. Abramova O.G. (2018), “Digitalization as the main trend of modernization of the public administration system in modern conditions” [“Tsifrovizatsiya kak osnovnaya tendentsiya modernizatsii sistemy publichnogo upravleniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh”], View of the XXI century generation on the future of the digital economy: collection of articles by teachers of the IX International scientific and practical conference. “Modern economy: concepts and models of innovative development” [Vzglyad pokoleniya XXI veka na budushchee tsifrovoi ekonomiki: sbornik statei prepodavatelei IX Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Sovremennaya ekonomika: kontseptsii i modeli innovatsionnogo razvitiya”], Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii universitet imeni G.V. Plekhanova, Moscow, pp. 486–493. [In Russian].

2. Avanesova G.A. et al. (2009), Synergetic paradigm: social synergetics [Sinergeticheskaya paradigma: sotsia`’naya sinergetika], red.-sost.: O.N. Astaf`eva, V.G. Budanov, otv. red.: V.V. Vasil`kova, Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].

3. Avdeeva Z.K. and Raikov A.N. et al. (2019), “System of distributed situational development centers for strategic targeting” [“Sistema raspredelennykh situatsionnykh tsentrov razvitiya dlya ustoichivogo strategicheskogo upravleniya”], Reflective processes and management: Collection of materials of the XII International scientific and practical interdisciplinary symposium [Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie: Sbornik materialov XII Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo mezhdistsiplinarnogo simpoziuma], otv. red. V.E. Lepskii, Kogito-tsentr, Moscow, pp. 256–260. [In Russian].

4. Babintsev V.P. (2018), “Power and public communications in the region: is the constructive system possible?” [“Vlastno-obshchestvennye kommunikatsii v regione: vozmozhna li konstruktivnaya sistema?”], Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences [Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk], vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 12–22.

5. Cate F. H. (2008), Government data mining: the need for a legal framework, Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 435–489.

6. Drucker P.F. (1963), Managing for business effectiveness, Harvard Business Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 53–60.

7. Gubanov A.V. (2017), “The practice of application of social network in the activities of state and municipal authorities (on the example of the Central black earth region)” [“Praktika primeneniya sotsial`nykh setei v deyatel`nosti organov gosudarstvennoi i munitsipal’noi vlasti (na primere Tsentral`no-Chernozemnogo raiona)”], Communicology [Kommunikologiya], vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 220–230.

8. Gubov A.Yu. (2020), “Transition from informatization to digitalization of state activities” [“Perekhod ot informatizatsii k tsifrovizatsii deyatel`nosti gosudarstva”], Daily online publication D-russia [Ezhednevnoe onlain-izdanie D-russia]. Available at: http://d-russia.ru/perehod-ot-informatizacii-k-cifrovizacii-dejatelnosti-gosudarstva.html (accessed 11.05.2020).

9. Il`in N.I. (2019), “A new stage in the development of situational centers of public authorities” [“Novyi etap razvitiya situatsionnykh tsentrov organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti”], Soft Measurements and Computing [Myagkie izmereniya i vychisleniya], no. 9, pp. 4–7.

10. Kamolov S.G. (2017), “Public administration in the digital age” [“Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v tsifrovuyu epokhu”], 25 years of Russian foreign policy: collection of materials of the X Rami Convention. Moscow, December 8-9, 2016: in 5 volumes. Vol. 2: Russia and the modern world: politicy and security: in 2 parts. Part 2 [25 let vneshnei politiki Rossii: sb. materialov X Konventa RAMI. Moskva, 8-9 dekabrya 2016 g.: v 5 t. T. 2: Rossiya i sovremennyi mir: politika i bezopasnost`: v 2 ch. Ch. 2], pod obshch. red. A.V. Mal`gina, MGIMO-Universitet, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].

11. Kornilovich V.A. (2015), Strategic management: sociological approach [Strategicheskoe upravlenie: sotsiologicheskii podkhod], Institut Sotsiologii RAN, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].

12. Lathrop D. and Ruma L. (2010), Open government: collaboration, transparency and participation in practice, CA, O’Reilly Media, Inc, Sebastopol.

13. Pankratov I.Yu., Svertilova N.V. and Lide E.N. (2019), “Digital transformation: risks and threats, opportunities and prospects of development” [“Tsifrovaya transformatsiya: riski i ugrozy, vozmozhnosti i perspektiv yrazvitiya”], Public Administration [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba], vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 64–74.

14. Ratti C., Frenchman D., Pulselli R.M., and Williams S. (2006), Mobile landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 33, pp. 727–748.

15. Smorgunov L.V. (2014), “Manageability and network political management” [“Upravlyaemost` i setevoe politicheskoe upravlenie”], Power [Vlast’], no. 6, pp. 5–14.

16. Vasilenko V.I. et al. (2010), Transformation processes in the system of access to state secret of Russia: monograph [Transformatsionnye protsessy v sisteme dopuska k gosudarstvennoi taine Rossii: monografiya], pod red. A.A. Prokhozheva, Prospekt, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].

17. Vasilenko V.I. (2012), “Problems of regulation of civil society`s relationships with authorities in the interests of national safety” [“Problemy regulirovaniya vzaimootnoshenii grazhdanskogo obshchestva s organami vlasti v interesakh bezopasnosti strany”], Sociology of Power [Sotsiologiya vlasti], no. 2, pp. 193–201.

18. Vasilenko L.A. (2014), “Formation and implementation of innovative competencies of civil servants in the context of challenges of globalization” [“Formirovanie i realizatsiya innovatsionnykh kompetentsii gossluzhashchikh v usloviyakh vyzovov globalizatsii”], Public Administration [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba], no. 2 (88), pp. 42–45.

19. Vasilenko L.A. and Vasilenko V.I. (2014), “Innovative models of dialogue between government and society in Internet communications: joint search for development paths” [“Innovatsionnye modeli dialoga vlasti I obshchestva v internet-kommunikatsiyakh: sovmestnyi poisk putei razvitiya”], Image in the strategy of innovative development of Russian regions: Collection of articles of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference, Volgograd, June 19-21, 2014[Imidzh v strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov Rossii: Sbornik statei Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Volgograd, 19-21 iyunya, 2014 g.], otv red. Yu.A. Drozdov, A.A. Ogarkov, Izd-vo RANKhiGS (Volgogradskii filial), Volgograd, pp. 7–11. [In Russian]. doi 10.18411/Vasilenko-1-14

20. Zotov V.V. and Gubanov A.V. (2017), “Performance assessment of the state and municipal employees on the basis of their self-presentation in social networks” [“Otsenka deyatel`nosti gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal`nykh sluzhashchikh na osnove ikh samoprezentatsii v sotsial`nykh setyakh”], Proceedings of the South-West State University. Series: Economy. Sociology. Management [Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment], vol. 7, no. 2 (23), pp. 174–181.

21. Zvereva G.I. (2019), “The concepts of “platform companies” in modern social and cultural studies” [“Kontseptsii “platformennogo obshchestva” v sovremennykh sotsiokul`turnykh issledovaniyakh”], RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series [Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul`turologiya], no. 8, pp. 161–171.