Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Digital Sociology

Advanced search

Socio-psychological factors of students` satisfaction in the context of digitalization of education during the COVID-19 pandemic and self-isolation

https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-2-46-54

Abstract

As you know, digitalization of many aspects of modern society became relevant in the XX1 century for most developed countries. This process is also typical for the Russian Federation, and it has received a special acceleration during the current period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Rapid development of digitalization is now taking place in the field of education, where distance learning is becoming one of the Central forms. This impetuosity has created a number of problems, both organizational and psychological, since the real reality has not yet been fully prepared for radical changes in both the teaching methodology and the methods of obtaining knowledge by the student audience. Accordingly, this transformation of such an important social sphere as education requires the efforts of representatives of many scientific disciplines, including philosophers, sociologists, cultural scientists, and psychologists. The latter, in addition to theoretical justifications, conduct a number of empirical studies on the psychological adaptability of young people studying to new conditions. One of them is the proposed study, which is based on the assumption that the level of satisfaction with work in the distance format of students during the period of self-isolation depends a lot on the degree of their subjective well-being. The socio-psychological factors that characterize the subjective well-being of students in this situation include: skills for distance learning, satisfaction with the results of this form of education, maintaining relationship with classmates, and the effectiveness of remote interaction with teachers. The empirical part of the study involved 100 students of student age. It has been revealed that the educational environment with a low level of quality (lack of electronic equipment on self-isolation, necessary for providing distance learning) and uncoordinated contacts with teachers and classmates, can negatively affect some components of satisfaction with distance education of students.

About the Author

I. E. Sokolovskaya
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Sokolovskaya Irina, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Moscow, Russia



References

1. Abramova M.A. and Farnika M. (2019), “Digitalization of education in the context of digital inequality” [“Tsifrovizatsiya obrazovaniya v usloviyakh tsifrovogo neravenstva”], Professional Education in the Modern World [Professional`noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire], vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3167–3175. doi: 10.15372/PEMW20190403

2. Csikosova A., Teplicka K. and Senova A. (2012), Communication and humanization of university education through e-learning, Рrocedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 2978–2982. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.600

3. Deryagin A.V. and Samedov M.N. (2020), “Digital technologies in the study of automotive electronics in the preparation of bachelors: traditions and innovations” [“Tsifrovye tekhnologii v izuchenii avtomobil’noi elektroniki pri podgotovke bakalavrov: traditsii i innovatsii”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 94–99. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0024

4. Efremova O.N., Plotnikova I.V. and Pavlik N.B. (2017), “Evaluation of the use of distance technologies in the educational process from the point of view of students` satisfaction” [“Otsenka ispol’zovaniya distantsionnykh tekhnologii v obrazovatel’nom protsesse s pozitsii udovletvorennosti studentov”], Alma Mater (Higher School Herald) [Alma Mater (Vestnik Vysshei Shkoly)], no. 5, pp. 70–74.

5. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. (2002). “Diagnostics of Personal and Group Satisfaction with Work” [“Diagnostika lichnostnoi i gruppovoi udovletvorennosti rabotoi”], Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp, Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii, pp. 473-474.

6. Grebenyuk A.A. (2020), “Influence of internal characteristics of new media on the mentality and mental health of a modern person” [Vliyanie vnutrennikh kharakteristik novykh media na mental’nost’ i psikhicheskoe zdorov’e sovremennogo cheloveka”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 337–343. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0083

7. Kornienko A. (2015), University education in the development of knowledge-based society: network technologies of scientific research and cyberscience as factors of education professionalization, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 206, pp. 359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.065

8. Kudashov V.I. and Dumov A.V. (2019), “Informatization and digitalization is a complex approach to assessing the transformation of education” [“Informatizatsiya i tsifrovizatsiya – slozhnyi podkhod k otsenke transformatsii obrazovaniya”], Professional Education in the Modern World [Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire], vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3176–3186. doi: 10.15372/PEMW20190404

9. Loyko О., Dryga S., Park J. and Palianov M. (2015), Modern professional education in the global society: comparative study, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 206, pp. 464–468. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.084

10. Mal’tseva S.M., Balashova E.S., Bogacheva A.V. and Kotova A.V. (2020), “The problem of formation of students’ self-control in the process of studying at the University” [“Problema formirovaniya samokontrolya studentov v protsesse obucheniya v vuze”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 24–27. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0004

11. Martyshek S.N. (2020), “Influence of the Internet on the formation of the communicative environment of modern youth” [“Vliyanie internet na formirovanie kommunikativnoi sredy sovremennoi molodezhi”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 185–189. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0044

12. Reznichenko N.S., Taptygina E.V. and Morozova T.D. (2011), “Comparative analysis of the quality of distance learning for students” [“Sravnitel’nyi analiz kachestva distantsionnogo obucheniya studentov”], Siberian Medical Review [Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie], no. 4 (70), pp. 99–103. doi: 10.20333/2500136

13. Romanova A.V., Polevaya M.V., Khammatova R.S., Sokolovskaya I.E., Platonova E.V. and Kolosova V.V. (2020), The innovative activity development of higher educational institutions, Opcion, vol. 36, no. S27, pp. 1064–1080.

14. Shutenko E.N., Shutenko A.I. and Kanishcheva M.A. (2020), Personal features of students` self-realization in the University educational environment, Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 403–407. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0098

15. Sokolovskaya I.E. (2019), “Digitalization of the teacher as an important process of development of students” [“Tsifrovizatsiya pedagoga kak vazhnyi protsess razvitiya obuchaemykh”], Chelovecheskii capital, no. S12-2 (132), pp. 540–544.

16. Sosnina N.G. (2020), “Digital communication technologies as a means of forming foreign language communicative competence” [“Tsifrovye kommunikativnye tekhnologii kak sredstvo formirovaniya inoyazychnoi kommunikativnoi kompetentnosti”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 268–271. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0063

17. Tatarinov K.A. (2020), “Methodological aspects of developing multimedia e-learning courses” [“Metodicheskie aspekty razrabotki mul’timediinykh kursov elektronnogo obucheniya”], Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 227–280. doi: 10.26140/anip-2020-0901-0065

18. Tonkonog V.V. and Ananchenkova P.I. (2017), “Distance learning in the regional educational space in the process of preparing students of different directions and specialties” [“Distantsionnoe obuchenie v regional’nom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve v protsesse podgotovki studentov raznykh napravlenii i spetsial’nostei”], Entrepreneur`s Guide [Putevoditel’ predprinimatelya], no. 35, pp. 284–293. doi: 10.24182

19. Vorontsov V. and Vorontsova E. (2015), Innovative education in Russia: the basic tendencies analysis, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 214, pp. 1147–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.731


Review

For citations:


Sokolovskaya I.E. Socio-psychological factors of students` satisfaction in the context of digitalization of education during the COVID-19 pandemic and self-isolation. Digital Sociology. 2020;3(2):46-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-2-46-54

Views: 6286


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-347X (Print)
ISSN 2713-1653 (Online)