Rotational dynamics between bureaucracy and electocracy
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-3-4-36-42
Abstract
It is generally believed that, based on the principle of separation of powers, the branches of government are endowed with independence from each other and equality among themselves, which means that they can control and balance each other’s activities. This principle can also be considered true for politicians, representatives of each of the branches of government. Bureaucrats holding positions in the executive branch are politically equal to electocrats in the legislative branch. At the same time, bureaucrats and electocrats are politicians of different kinds, they have a large number of differences in their powers, functions, rights, and competencies. But does this principle remain immutable for the Russian political system de facto? Are bureaucrats and electocrats so different from each other in Russia? The present study, analyses the biographies of 800 politicians of the Russian Federation who hold public positions in the executive and legislative authorities of all three levels: federal, regional, and municipal. The analysis allowed us to reveal the specifics of recruitment and circulation of personnel in the Russian political system, which makes it possible to speak with a high degree of probability about the trends in the development of the Russian establishment as a whole.
Keywords
About the Author
I. A. LavrovRussian Federation
Ivan A. Lavrov, Senior specialist of the Centre for the study of the Russian Elite, Moscow, Russia
References
1. G.K. Ashin (1998), “Forms of recruiting political elites” [“Formy rekrutirovaniya politicheskikh elit”], Social Sciences and Contemporary World [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’], no.3, pp. 85–96. (In Russian).
2. A.V. Duka (2014), “Post-Soviet elite: institutionalization and recruitment”[“Postsovetskaya elita: institutsionalizatsiya i rekrutirovanie”], Political Institutions of Russia and France: Traditions and Modernity: Collection of Proceedings. Series “Political Science” [Politicheskie instituty Rossii i Frantsii: traditsii i sovremennost’: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Seriya “Politilogiya”], INION RAN, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
3. O.V. Kryshtanovskaya (2005), Anatomy of the Russian elite [Anatomiya rossiiskoi elity], Zakharov, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
4. I.A. Lavrov (2019), “Catalysts and inhibitors of political career in Russia” [“Katalizatory i ingibitory politicheskoi kar’ery v Rossii”], Vestnik Universiteta, no.12, pp. 193–199. (In Russian).
5. D.V. Pokatov (2019), “Recruiting the modern Russian political elite as a rotation of political and administrative-corporate elite groups” [“Rekrutirovanie sovremennoi rossiiskoi politicheskoi elity kak rotatsiya politicheskoi i administrativno-korporativnoi elitnykh grupp”], Power and Elites [Vlast’ i elity], vol.6, no.1, pp. 71–97. (In Russian).
6. N.A. Yushkina (2019), “Influence of educational trajectories on the formation of the management elite in the Russian federal authorities” [“Vliyanie obrazovatel’nykh traektorii na formirovanie upravlencheskoi elity v rossiiskikh federal’nykh organakh vlasti], Vestnik Universiteta, no.11, pp. 176–183. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lavrov I.A. Rotational dynamics between bureaucracy and electocracy. Digital Sociology. 2020;3(4):36-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-3-4-36-42