Digital society: theoretical outlines of the emerging paradigm

The large-scale changes in the life of modern society caused by digitalization, as well as numerous studies of various manifestations and aspects of this process, give rise to the need to develop a concept of a digital society. The attempt to solve this research problem, implemented in the article, represents one of its possible models.

In the proposed model, the digital society is considered as the next stage of post-industrial development and an element of modern global technogenic civilization. The implementation of the plan is based on the institutionalization of digital public relations. The basis of the process is the construct “human – knowledge – communication networks – computer technology”. Its elements in the course of interaction give rise to digital formal and informal institutions in the economy, politics, culture, and social life; form a new structural element of society – the digital information sphere; develop into a whole as a digital society. Digital institutions and the digital sphere, acting as mechanisms for the emergence of society, rely on their own type of activity, have a new type of personality as a subject – “information person”.

The analysis, undertaken within the framework of the neo-institutional approach, the features of the socialization of e-Homo Sapiens are revealed, based on the need for presence and activity in the information space, taking into account the impact of modern information technologies, which ultimately contribute to the inconsistency of the emerging typological properties. The decisive role of the human factor in the emergence of the digital society as a knowledge society made it necessary to rely on the principle of social determinism for the entire research structure. This technique allowed us to substantiate the conclusion about the human creator, the subject of social existence as the main characteristic and source of development of the digital society. Any changes in the indicators of subjectivity will serve as factors for the appearance of components of a future civilization based on this society, the contours of which are not transparent today.

1. Ageev A.L., Aver´yanov M.A., Evtushenko S.N. and Kochetova E.Yu. (2017), “Digital society: architecture, principles, vision”, Economic Strategies, no. 1 (143), pp. 114–125. (In Russian).

2. Bell D. (1986), “Social framework of the information society” (Translated by Yu.V. Nikulichev), New Technocratic Wave in the West: Collection of Articles, responsible editor P.S. Gurevich, Progress, Moscow, Russia, pp. 330–342. (In Russian).

3. Bourdieu P. and Passeron J.-C. (1970), Reproduction: Elements of education system theory [La Reproduction: éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement], Minuit, Paris, France. Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/5/5a/Bourdieu_Pierre_Passeron_Jean_Claude_La_reproduction_1970.pdf (accessed 13.04.21). (In French).

4. Castells M. (2000), The information age: economy, society and culture, translated from English under scientific editorship by O.I. Shkaratan, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

5. Bell D. (1980). “The social framework of the information society”, The Microelectronics Revolution: The Complete Guide to the New Technology and Its Impact on Society, edited by T. Forester, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.

6. Habermas J. (1981). Theory of communicative actions. Vol. 2. On the critique of functionalist reason [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 2. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischenVernunft], Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany. (In German).

7. Harari Yu.N. (2018), Homo Deus: A brief history of the future, translated from English by A. Andreev, Sinbad, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

8. Kaftan V.V. and Chernavin Yu.A. (2021), “Managers from Networks: A hymn to humanism or the pathos of technocratism?”, Digital Economy and the New Labor Market: Jobs, Competences and Innovative HR Technologies. IPM 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 161, Springer, Cham, pp. 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60926-9_39

9. Luhmann N. (2004), Society as a social system [Gesellschaft als soziales System], translated from German by A.Yu. Antonovskii, Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

10. Maslov V.M. (2010), “The post-man`s focus of the philosophy of high-tech”, Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhi Novgorod, Series: Social Sciences, no. 3 (19), pp. 140–146. (In Russian).

11. Maslow A.H. (2014), Motivation and personality, translated from English by T. Gutman, N. Mukhin, edited by E.P. Il`in, Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).

12. Murzagulov R.R. (2018), Digital society of the mid-XXI century as a new stage of civilizational development. Socio-philosophical analysis, Russia, Izdatel`skie resheniya, Russia. (In Russian).

13. North D., Wallis J. and Weingast B. (2007), “A conceptual approach to explaining the history of mankind”, EKOVEST, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4–59. (In Russian).

14. Toffler E. (2010), The third wave, translated from English by L.M. Burmistrov et al., edited by S.A. Gudimova, AST, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

15. Yalkin Ç., Kerrigan F. and Vom Lehn D. (2014), “Legitimisation of the role of the nation state: understanding of and reactions to Internet censorship in Turkey”, New Media & Society, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813479762

16. Zhulego V.G., Balyakin A.A., Nurbina M.V. and Taranenko S.B. (2018), “Digitalization of society: new challenges in the social sphere”, Journal of Altai Academy of Economics and Law, no. 9-2, pp. 36–43. (In Russian).