The role of the Internet in formation of the protest mood of the region’s population

This article analyses the degree of Internet penetration and the level of involvement of the Vologda region residents in the information and communication space. The author made an attempt to establish the existence of a connection between the protest moods of the residents of the region and the use of Internet resources, including for participation in public life. The information and empirical base of the study was the data of the monitoring of public opinion conducted by the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the territory of the region.

The results of the study showed that in recent years there has been a significant increase in the use of Internet technologies and social networks. According to calculations, the demand for information provided by the electronic mass media is increasing among the residents of the region who show protest moods, and the level of trust in this communication channel is growing. However, there is no direct correlation between the dynamics of the growth of Internet engagement and protest moods. The Internet and social media are not a factor of protest potential. They act as an information and communication platform that creates a technical opportunity for public discussion and facilitates the organization of protest moods. At the same time, the Internet can strengthen the effect of other factors, such as: dissatisfaction of the population with their own material well-being and the general economic situation in the country and the region, disapproval of the activities of the authorities, uncertainty of prospects and uncertainty in the future.

1. Barber B. (2001), “The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy’s uneasy relationship with information Technology”, Harvard International Review, no. 23, pp. 42–45.

2. Coleman S. (2005), “New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age”, New Media Society, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444805050745

3. Davis R. (2002), The web of politics network: the Internet`simpact on the American political system, Actual Problems of Europe. Mass media and democracy in the modern world: collection of articles and abstracts, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAN INION), Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

4. Dementieva I.N. (2020), “Protest potential of the region’s population in the context of the coronavirus pandemic: the possibility of index analysis”, Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Pravo, no. 3 (19), pp. 67–75. (In Russian).

5. Devyatkov A. and Makarychev A. (2012), “New media and network subjectivity in Russia”, Vestnik Instituta Kenana v Rossii, no. 22, pp. 7–12. (In Russian).

6. Etzioni A. (1999), The spirit of community: rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda, Crown Publishers, New York, USA.

7. Grachev M.N. (2004), Political communication: theoretical concepts, models, vectors of development, Prometei, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

8. Gudoshnikova O.E. (2015), “Technologies of “New Media” as a platform of civic engagement”, Modern Problems of Science and Education, no. 1-1. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25325722_78386819.pdf (accessed 20.03.2021). (In Russian).

9. Il`icheva Yu.A. (2013), “Mobilization technologies: essence, background of origin, major tools and means”, Mediascope, no. 2. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1335 (accessed 20.03.2021). (In Russian).

10. Kiselev A.A. and Samarkina I.V. (2007), Internet: model and practices of political participation, Ottisk, Krasnodar, Russia. (In Russian).

11. Kol`tsova O.Yu. and Kirkizh E.A. (2016), “Impact of the Internet on participation in protests”, Politeia, no. 1 (80), pp. 90–110. (In Russian).

12. Konovchenko S.V. (2003), Power, society and the press in Russia, SKNTs VSh, Publishing house “Kniga”, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. (In Russian).

13. Kravchenko I.V. (2003), Power and communication: problems of interaction in the information society: monograph, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).

14. Magnitskii Yu.G. (2012), “Internet as a modern media factor of protest moods: opinions and assessments”, Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 58, pp. 38–47. (In Russian).

15. Melyukhin I.S. (1999), Information society: origins, problems, development trends, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

16. Norris P. (2000), A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343

17. Polat R.K. (2005), “The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links”, European Journal of Communication, no. 20, pp. 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058251

18. Rheingold H. (1991), “The great equalizer”, Whole Earth Review, Summer, New York, USA, pp. 80–88.

19. Reut O.Ch. (2013), Blogospheric discourse of legitimacy in the Russian electoral cycle 2011–2012, Social Networks and Virtual Network Communities: Collection of Scientific Papers, responsible editors L.N. Verchenov, D.V. Efremenko, V.I. Tishchenko, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAN INION), Moscow, Russia, pp. 161–173. (In Russian).

20. Sokolov A.V. (2020), “Index modeling of protest: approaches to understanding and results of approbation”, South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40–64. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-1-40-64

21. Turonok S.G. (2001), “The Internet and the political process”, Social Sciences and Contemporary World, no. 2, pp. 51–63. (In Russian).

22. Ward S., Gibson R. and Lusoli W. (2003), “Online participation and mobilization in Britain: Hype, hope and reality”, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg108

23. Weber L., Loumakis A. and Bergman J. (2003), “Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public”, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 26–42.

24. Yanitskii O.I. (2012), “Rehabilitation of civil activism in Russia; peasantry and the power in the history of Russia the XX-th centuries: a round table discussion”, Social Sciences and Contemporary World, no. 3, pp. 58–68. (In Russian).