Public management of smart cities: European experience

The article presents a rethinking of the results of research in the field of smart city management based on publications in Spain and the Netherlands. Three areas of research have been identified. The first one offers scientific studies of smart city management and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of smart management based on a clear understanding of the degree of legitimacy of decision-making. The author considers these processes in comparison with the Russian scientists approaches, and focuses on the important conclusion of foreign scientists that technology alone will not make the city smarter: the construction of a smart city requires a political understanding of technology, a process approach to management, an emerging smart city, and a focus on both economic benefits and other public values. The second group of articles, considered by the author, presents a more comprehensive view of the concepts of smart cities, with smart governance, combining, presumably, innovative structures and new technologies, new communication channels aimed at the constant functioning of the city management system and the environment for cooperation and citizen engagement. The third group of publications deals with critical aspects of the development of smart governance in practice and the resulting consequences, in particular, the reassessment of the ability of the private sector to develop and implement intelligent technologies, the predominance of a technocratic approach to decision-making, the inability to ensure impartiality and objectivity, the lack of the ability to analyse urban data, cloud computing on digital platforms to stimulate production in a collaborative environment. Their conclusion about the need for “smart management” to pay attention to the processes of socio-spatial development is quite correlated with the conclusions of Russian scientists.

1. Alkandari A., Alnasheet M. and Alshekhly I.F.T. (2012), “Smart cities: Survey”, Journal ofAdvanced Computer Science and Technology Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 79–90.

2. Barns S. (2018), “Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance”, City, Culture and Society, vol. 12, pp. 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006

3. Batagan L. (2011), “Smart cities and sustainability models”, Informatica Economica, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 80–87.

4. Batty M., Axhausen KW., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., Ouzounis G. and Portugali Y. (2012), “Smart cities of the future”, European Physical Journal, vol. 214, pp. 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/EPJST/E2012-01703-3

5. Caragliu A. and Del Bo C. (2012), “Smartness and European urban performance: Assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660323

6. Coupryashin G.L., (2016), “Public administration”, Political Science, no. 2, pp. 101–131. (In Russian).

7. Gil-Garcia R. (2012), Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions, Springer, Boston, USA.

8. Jiang H., Geertman S. and Witte P. (2020), “Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap”, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320934824

9. Kourtit K., Nijkamp P. and Arribas D. (2012), “Smart cities in perspective – a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps”, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660330

10. Meijer A. and Rodríguez Bolivar M.P. (2016), “Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 82, no. 2, pр. 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

11. Nam T. (2012), Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems, Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York, USA.

12. Ruhlandt R.W.S. (2018), “The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review”, Cities, vol. 81, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014

13. Scharpf F. (1999), Governing Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford, UK.

14. Shilova V.A. (2015), The communicative field of management: theory, methodology, practice: monograph, Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

15. Shilova V.A. and Bykov K.V. (2018), “The problem of managing the preservation of historical and cultural heritage in the regional context”, Research Result. Series Sociology and management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 152–163. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408- 9338-2018-4-4-0-13

16. Schuurman D., Baccarne B., De Marez L. and Mechant P. (2012), “Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 49–62. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000300006

17. Tapscott D. and Agnew D. (1999), “Governance in the digital economy: The importance of human development”, Finance & Development, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 34–37.

18. Tikhonov A.V. and Bogdanov V.S. (2020), “From “clever regulation” to “clever management”: social problem of digitalization of feedbacks”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 1, pp. 74–81. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008325-0

19. Tikhonov A.V., Bogdanov V.S. and Merzljakov A.A. (2014), “Experience of remote analysis of the implementation of cluster policy in regional and sectoral aspects”, MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), no. 20, pp. 52–65. (In Russian).

20. Tikhonov A.V., Merzllyakov A.A. and Pochestnev A.A. (2021), “The latent group formation phenomen in regions with different sociocultural modernization levels”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 10, pp. 139–148. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250012270-0

21. Vasilenko L.A. (2021), “Digital breakthrough: will public administration be smart enough in a digital state and how smart are the elite and citizens”, Digital Sociology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 6–15. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-3-6-15

22. Vasilenko L.A., Zotov V.V. and Zakharova S.A. (2021), “Social media potential for developing participatory governance”, RUDN journal of sociology, vol. 20, no. 4. pp. 864–876. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-864-876

23. Vasilenko L.A. and Meshcheryakova N.N. (2021), Sociology of digital society,Tomsk Polytechnic University Publishing House, Tomsk, Russia. (In Russian).

24. Walravens N. (2012), “Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000300011

25. Winters J.V. (2011), “Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays”, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x

26. Zotov V.V., Zakharov V.M. and Sapryka V.M. (2021), “Digitalization of public administration: e-democracy vs e-government”, Nomothetika: Philosophy. Sociology. Right, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 250–262. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-2-250-262