Russian authority and the Internet: safety vs freedom of speech
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-2-12-24
Abstract
The Internet, in the era of its availability and popularity in modern Russia, plays the most important role both in the dissemination of information and in the daily communications of people. Mass media also use Internet platforms as the main ones in their activities, because traditional forms of media already have a smaller audience coverage, than online-editions. Due to the fact, that in the modern Russia traditional mass media are controlled by the authorities, the Internet remains the last platform, on which independent sources can lead their activities. For today, Internet is the main force, shaping public opinion and trends. In this regard, the current Russian government has a need to develop new measures and introduce new laws to regulate this area. But is it really the primary authority`s task to ensure security within the Russian Internet, or is it driven by the desire to take control of the Internet and restrict its freedom?
The main actions of the Russian authorities, taken to ensure the security of the Russian Internet, in chronological order, have been considered and analyzed. Both texts of laws and their real results after adoption have been reviewed and analyzed. For each such action an assessment of public opinion in relation to these innovations has been adduced. The compliance of the stated goals and objectives of the draft laws with their actual results has been considered. The analysis of international assessments of freedom of the mass media, freedom of the Internet and individual freedom in the Russian Federation during various periods of the implementation of these laws in everyday life has been given.
About the Authors
I. A. LavrovRussian Federation
Lavrov Ivan, Postgraduate student
Moscow
A. V. Sokol
Russian Federation
Sokol Aleksander, Student
Moscow
References
1. Akishina V.D. (2018), “The problem of controllability on the example of Telegram lock” [“Problema upravlyaemosti na primere blokirovki Telegram”], Science of Alley [Alleya nauki], no. 4, pp. 570–575.
2. Pivovarov V.A. (2019), “Features of the impact of Internet communities on the formation of the political agenda in modern Russia (on the example of the Telegram messenger)” [“Osobennosti vliyaniya internet-soobshchestv na formirovanie politicheskoi povestki dnya v sovremennoi Rossii (na primere messendzhera Telegram)”], News from Saratov University. New series. Series: Sociology. Political science [Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sociologiya. Politologiya], no. 1, pp. 113–116.
3. Shogenov T.M. (2017), “O nekotorykh voprosakh protivodeistviya ekstremizmu v seti Internet” [“On some issues of countering extremism on the Internet”], Gaps in Russian legislation [Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve], no. 3, pp. 58–59.
4. Soldatov A.A., Borogan I.P. (2017), Battle for Runet. How the authority manipulates information and monitors each of us [Bitva za Runet. Kak vlast’ manipuliruet informatsiei i sledit za kazhdym iz nas], Al’pina Pablisher, Moscow, Russia. [In Russian].
5. Tigranyan E.A. (2018), “The Yarovaya Anti-Terror Package: The Reaction of Russian and Foreign Publications” [“Antiterroristicheskii paket” Yarovoi: reaktsiya rossiiskikh i zarubezhnykh izdanii”], Scientific Bulletins of Belgorod State University. Series: Humanities [Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye nauki], no. 1, pp. 103–112.
Review
For citations:
Lavrov I.A., Sokol A.V. Russian authority and the Internet: safety vs freedom of speech. Digital Sociology. 2019;2(2):12-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2019-2-12-24