Psychological needs and motivation of remote workers: sociological viewpoint

The article presents the findings of a sociological study, which uses Self-Determination Theory to describe and explain the motivation of remote workers. Representing a fundamentally different form of labor organization, remote work forms new conditions in which many management problems are solved, including motivation. An online survey conducted among Russian remote workers (N = 402) measured the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs (for autonomy, competence and relatedness) and six types of motivation, forming a continuum from amotivation to intrinsic motivation. According to the results, satisfaction of psychological needs creates conditions for the development of intrinsic motivation of remote workers, thus supporting Self-Determination Theory. The study also reveals that identified regulation and intrinsic motivation are more pronounced than other types of motivation. This may explain why in many studies remote workers are very positive regarding their remote work experience, in comparison with traditional forms of labor organization. The study thus confirms the applicability and value of Self-Determination Theory for explaining the features of remote work and designing optimal work organization models based on it.

1. Arunprasad P., Dey C., Jebli F. et al. (2022), “Exploring the remote work challenges in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Review and application model”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 3333–3355, https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2021-0421

2. Cascio W.F. (2000), “Managing a virtual workplace”, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 81–90.

3. Dryselius A., Pettersson J. (2021), Understanding the threats and opportunities to motivation during enforced remote work. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

4. Earl-Wilcox K.A. (2021), Autonomy and Engagement as Intrinsic Motivation Factors for Remote Workers, PhD Dissertation. Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, US.

5. Felstead A., Henseke G. (2017), “Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance”, New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 195–212, https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12097

6. Gagne M., Forest J., Vansteenkiste M. et al. (2015), “The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale : validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 178–196, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892

7. Galanti T., Guidetti G., Mazzei E. et al. (2021), “Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress”, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, vol. 63(7), pp. e426–e432, https://doi.org/10.1097%2FJOM.0000000000002236

8. Gatti P., Bligh M.C., Cortese C.G. (2019), “When a leader job resource can be ambivalent or even destructive: independence at work as a double-edged sword”, Plos One, vol. 14, no.5, art. num. e0217482, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217482

9. Konobevtsev F., Laas N., Gurova E., Romanova I. (2019), “Remote work: technologies and experience of the organization”, Vestnik Universiteta, no. 7, pp. 9–17, https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-7-9-17

10. Kruchinin S.V. (2015), “Remote work as a new form of economic activity of the population”, Scientific discussions, vol. 3, pp. 62–64.

11. Messenger J.C., Ghosheh N. (2010), Offshoring and Working Conditions in Remote Work, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, US.

12. Nagibina N.I., Imamutdinova O.R., Dyatlova A.A. (2019), “Remote work: evolution, analysis, prospects”, Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 50–59, https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5d7b93e6a4a726.48395170

13. Nickson D., Siddons S. (2004), Remote Working: Linking People and Organizations, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, US.

14. Olson M.H. (1983), “Remote office work: changing patterns in space and time”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 182–187, https://doi.org/10.1145/358061.358068

15. Olson M.H., Primps S.B. (1984), “Working at home with computers: work and nonwork issues”, Journal of Social Issues, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 97–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb00194.x

16. Orsini C., Rodrigues V. (2020), “Supporting motivation in teams working remotely: the role of basic psychological needs”, Medical Teacher, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 828-829, https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1758305

17. Ryan R., Deci E. (2000), “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being”, American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

18. Staples D.S. (1996), Management of remote workers: an information technology perspective, PhD Dissertation. The University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.

19. Staples D.S. (2001), “A study of remote workers and their differences from non-remote workers”, Journal of End-User Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 3–14, https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2001040101

20. Staples D.S. Hulland J.S., Higgis C.A. (1999), “A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations”, Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 758–776, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00085.x

21. Sullivan C. (2003), “What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking”, New Technology Work and Employment, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 158–165, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00118

22. Van den Broeck A., Vansteenkiste M., De Witte H. et al. (2010), “Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 83, pp. 981–1002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382

23. Volkov Yu.G., Krivopuskov V.V., Kurbatov V.I. (2021), “Digital migrants and digital diaspora: new problems and trends of international migration”, Digital Sociology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 102–108, https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-4-102-108

24. Westfall R.D. (1997), Remote work: a conceptual perspective on the demand for telecommuting: PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, US.

25. Zapoleva E.O., Simonova A.A., Pit V.V. (2022), “Sociological analysis of remote work as a new format of current population employment in Russia”, Digital Sociology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 68–75, https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2022-5-3-68-75