Social adaptation features of Chinese students to online learning in a university

The article presents the results of a search sociological study conducted in September-October 2023 on the problem of impact of online learning practices on the social adaptation of foreign students in a Russian university. The empirical objects were Chinese citizens studying at Lomonosov Moscow State University and currently located on the territory of Russia. In the research, the online questionnaire method provided answers to questions about the attitude of Chinese students to organisation of the educational process, to the practices of their interaction and communication in small study groups. It has been empirically proven that the attitude of Chinese students to any form of education depends on how much the issue of overcoming the language barrier and building intercultural communication has been resolved in a particular educational practice. At the same time, a positive attitude towards online learning is associated by Chinese students with the opportunity to study without having to stay in the territory of the Russian Federation, and a negative one is associated with communication problems, in particular, with the lack of direct communication with a teacher or supervisor. It was revealed that the most psychologically comfortable leaning forms for Chinese students are online classes. There is significant evidence of this category of students’ preference for a separate position, being inside their foreign cultural group and social circle. A more general project on the study of social well-being of students with special educational needs, has been specifically identified as a promising direction for the development of the research topic.

1. Andreev A.A. Internet technologies and learning models in the Internet environment. Moscow: MIPK; 2013. 57 p. (In Russian).

2. Averin Y.P. Theoretical construction of quantitative sociological research. Moscow: Academic project; 2014. 432 p. (In Russian).

3. Clark B.R. The higher education system: academic organization in a cross-national perspective. Trans. from Eng. A. Smirnova. Moscow: HSE Publ. House; 2011. 360 p. (In Russian).

4. Gustyr A.V. Introduction to distance education. Moscow: RIC “Alpha” MGOPU named after M.A. Sholokhov; 2000. 326 p. (In Russian).

5. Holmberg B. Guided didactic conversation in distance education. Distance education: international perspectives. London: Croom Helm; 1983. Pр. 114–122.

6. Karpenko M.P. Modern didactics of mass electronic education. Modern information technologies and IT education. 2017;4:58–64. (In Russian).

7. Keegan D. Reintegration of the teaching acts. Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge;1993. Рр. 113–134.

8. Konstantinovsky D.L., Kuznetsov I.S. The category of trust in the study of university choice. A sociological journal. 2020; 26(2): 82–101. (In Russian).

9. Kozlov V.N., Romanenkova D.F. The needs of persons with disabilities in competencies that expand employment opportunities in the context of digitalization of society. Digital sociology. 2022;5(3):76–87. (In Russian).

10. Lamsden C.J., Wilson E.O. Genes, mind and culture: the coevolutionary process. London: Harvard University; 1981.

11. Lenkov R.V. Digital learning: educational technology, high-tech environment, tool. Sociology of media communications: theory and practice. Moscow: MGPU; 2023. Pp. 81–95. (In Russian).

12. Moore M. Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education. 1973;44(12):661–679.

13. Peters O. Distance teaching and industrial production: a comparative interpretation in outline. Distance education: International perspectives. London: Croom Helm; 1983. Pp. 95–113.

14. Shibutani T. Social psychology. Trans. from Eng. V.B. Olshansky. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix; 1999. (In Russian).

15. Shugal N.B. Monitoring the economics of education: 2020: in 2 volumes. Moscow: HSE; 2021. (In Russian).

16. Tierney W.G. On the road to recovery and renewal reinventing academe. The responsive university. Restructuring for high performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 1998. Pp. 1–12.

17. Tikhomirov V.P. Distance education: history, economics, trends. Distance learning. 1997;2:69–73. (In Russian).

18. Verduin J.R., Clark T.A. Distance Education: the foundations of effective practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1991.

19. Zborovsky G.E., Shuklina E.A. Education of migrant children as a problem of their social adaptation. Sociological research. 2013;2:80–91. (In Russian).