Sociotechnical systems: historical origins and contemporary relevance
https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2026-9-1-93-102
Abstract
The genesis and evolution of the sociotechnical systems (STS) concept, one of the key approaches in organizational sociology and management, are considered. Based on a historical and sociological analysis of classical works and a secondary analysis of study results, the transition from the technocratic paradigm to an understanding of the inextricable relationship between technical and social components in complex systems is demonstrated. The classic works of the Tavistock Institute, which formulated the basic principles of STS, as well as the adaptation of these principles in the context of modern digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, platform solutions, and cyber-physical systems, are studied.
science, but transforms the very structure of interaction between technology, society, and the state. As the proceedings of the II International Symposium “Creating the Future” show, quantum technologies are becoming the core of a new sociotechnical system in which science, industry, education, regulatory institutions, and civil society are integrated into a single dynamic of coevolution.
The author concludes that in the digital age, the STS concept retains its heuristic value, offering a tool for analyzing and designing organizations where the success of innovations is determined by their harmonious integration into social practices.
The features of the Second Quantum Revolution are noted, which, unlike the First, is not limited to the framework of fundamental
About the Author
I. V. Mkrtumova
State University of Management;
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Mkrtumova - Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Professor at the Sociology, Psychology of Management and History Department; Prof. at the Political Analysis and Social-Psychological Processes Department
Moscow
References
1. Bakanova, E. A. (2020). Technoscience in the Information Society: a socio-philosophical analysis . Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.11. Tomsk: NITSU. (In Russian).
2. Bedanokov, R. A. (2013). T echnology and technical education in a post-industrial society: a cultural analysis. Diss. ... Dr. Sci. (Philos.): 24.00.01. Rostov-on-Don. (In Russian).
3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
4. Bukina, E. E. (2022). Philosophical analysis of the ethical foundations of technoscience in the perspective of the problem of human nature . Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.01. Tomsk: NITSU. (In Russian).
5. Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29(8), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677602900806
6. Fedorov, V. (2025). The race for quantum supremacy. In: Analytical collection of materials of the II International Symposium “Creating the Future”. Technology solutions for a complex world . Moscow: WCIOM. (In Russian).
7. Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business School Press.
8. DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160.
9. Emery, F. E., Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In: Management Science, Models and Techniques. Vol. 2. Pergamon Press.
10. Gevorgyan, A. V. (2006). The role of man in modern sociotechnical systems . Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.08. Moscow: Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation. (In Russian).
11. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration . University of California Press.
12. Gorbacheva, A. G. (2016). Socio-philosophical analysis of the impact of converging NBICS technologies on humans. Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.11. Tomsk: NITSU. (In Russian).
13. Gumarova, A. N. (2024). Neuroscience and neurotechnology in education: an ethical analysis. Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 00.00.00. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russian).
14. Haraway, D. (1985). A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review .
15. Lukyantsev, A. N. (2009). Cultural genesis: sociotechnical determinants and manifestation at the present stage . Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.13. Moscow. (In Russian).
16. Mkrtumova, I. V. (2023). Digital socialization: a symbiosis of mass media and artificial intelligence as a channel for the focal construction of value orientations of youth (socially approved or false). Sociology, 6 , 211–219. (In Russian).
17. Mkrtumova, I. V., Chizhov, D. A., Yanchuk, P. P., & Ashkar, M. (2025). Transformations of social communications in the context of digital platformization and the creation of metaverses of human assistance. Digital Sociology, 8 (1), 42–50. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658347X-2025-8-1-42-50
18. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19. Pilipishin, D. V. (2000). The human dimension of sociotechnical systems. Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.11. Moscow. (In Russian).
20. Sedov, A. E. (2004). Engineering activity in the context of the evolution of society: a socio-philosophical analysis. Diss. ... Cand. Sci. (Philos.): 09.00.11. Rostov-on-Don: Don State Technical University. (In Russian).
21. Trist, E. L. (1981). The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A conceptual framework and an action research program . Ontario Ministry of Labour.
22. Trist, E. L., Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting. Human Relations , 4 (1), 3–38.
23. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books.
Review
For citations:
Mkrtumova I.V. Sociotechnical systems: historical origins and contemporary relevance. Digital Sociology. 2026;9(1):93-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2026-9-1-93-102
Views:
24
JATS XML
Email this article 
